Posts

VIDEOS from 2022

Image
VIDEOS for 2022 Grace Jones’ song here, “I’ve Seen That Face Before,” is based on Astor Piazzolla’s “Libertango” ( read up on it ). This kid was introduced to the song in the flick  Frantic , when Harrison Ford and Emmanuelle Seigner danced to it in a Parisian nightclub. One can watch the scene  HERE  ; Emmanuelle has some moves. For you lovers out there, here’s French Canadian actress AndrĂ©e Lachapelle and composer Michel Legrand in a duet from Legrand’s  The Umbrellas of Cherbourg . To see the same scene from the 1964 movie, click  THIS : Here's a clip from a movie currently playing on HBO. At first, I thought the singer was Andy Williams, but it's  Steve Lawrence , who's 86 now. Those who'd like to hear Steve sing the entire song should go  HERE . The movie is  Nobody  (2021) and it's rather violent (what Anthony Burgess might call "a bit of the old ultraviolence"). But this short clip (2 minutes 9 seconds) is pretty tame, except for the F-bomb

Book Review

Image
Living in the Long Emergency By Jon N. Hall If Americans are concerned about energy prices and shortages, not to mention the end of civilization as we know it, then they might want to read James Howard Kunstler’s 2020 essay collection Living in the Long Emergency . In “Hey, What Happened to Peak Oil?” and “The Alt-Energy Freak Show” and “Money, Oil, and Their By-Products” (chapters 1, 2, and 13), Kunstler gives us his take on fossil fuels and their supposed replacements: renewables, i.e. wind and solar. He also analyzes the financial industry’s role in energy. Here’s a bit: The shale oil “miracle,” therefore, was a very impressive financial and technological stunt. In practical terms, it provided a means to pull forward from the future the last dregs of recoverable oil, so the US could live large for a few years longer. As independent oil analyst Arthur Berman put it: “Shale is a retirement party for the oil industry.”   Kunstler contends that shale oil, which has recently accounte

A Nation of Queuers Cannot Stand

… They also serve who only stand and prate By Cedric Trevelyan, K.C.B.   I am not usually of a humour to give consequence to the middle classes taking their leisure, nor indeed am I even likely to encounter such creatures, given my more rarified social circles. But occasionally of late, whilst standing in line to procure my afternoon libation at one of the trendy coffee shops that have begun to dot my adopted homeland, I find myself rubbing shoulders with those beneath my station, and I cannot help but wince as I perceive how passively these humble folk, our good proles, endure the abuse dished up to them by certain surly concocters of caffeinated refreshments who, despite being only a missed paycheque away from penury and usually of a lower class than that of those upon whom they wait, nonetheless feel it their birthright to banter and visit amongst themselves at insufferable length before deigning to sullenly acknowledge the presence of their customers patiently standing before
  So You Think You Understand Language By Jon N. Hall   The mathematician John von Neumann once said: “Young man, in mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them.” The same sort of thing might also be said about language -- you don't understand language, you just get used to it.   But with language, it may be even more the case than with mathematics. That’s because folks often have to invert the true meanings of words in order to grasp what they’re hearing, i.e. what’s intended. When one thinks about it for a bit, language itself can seem rather mystifying -- better to just use it, right?   Not if one is trying to be exact. It is for the sake of exactness and precision that we create “usage rules.” But we Anglophones need better usage rules for some of the most common words in English: conjunctions. Conjunctions can create ambiguity , and in some arenas of contemporary life, like law, ambiguity can’t be tolerated. Sad to say, but we Anglophon
Exciting New Discovery Challenges Conventional Wisdom                                                                       By Jon N. Hall   Paleontologists have recently unearthed compelling new evidence suggesting that for most of the early Pleistocene, the instincts of Man’s proto-human ancestors were severely attenuated. Although there are still disagreements in the scientific community over certain particulars of the raw data, some researchers speculate that some members of Australopithecus africanus may not have even sensed, however dimly, that they were related to and belonged with the others in their group. How, you may well wonder, could scientists know such a thing? More importantly, how could creatures so bereft even survive, much less take part in the long evolutionary march that ended with us, Homo sapiens —Modern Man?   To answer those questions you must first appreciate how terribly difficult life was on the arid savannahs of East Africa where Man arose. Indeed, l

TESTING EMBED CODE

Image
 
Forget Vaccines, Catch a Cold Instead By Jon N. Hall The Wuhan pandemic has been compared to the devastating Spanish flu pandemic of 1918, but the two differ in their victims. The Spanish flu hit young adults aged 20-40, a group that the Wuhan virus mostly doesn’t prey on. The Spanish flu also hit children, which our virus virtually ignores. I’m not an epidemiologist, but when compared to the Spanish flu, COVID-19 seems almost “benign.” The Spanish flu had a fatality rate of 2.5 percent , while the seasonal flu usually has a fatality rate of just 0.1 percent . Some research suggests that the fatality rate for Covid will ultimately turn out to be more in line with the seasonal flu than with the Spanish flu. And note that there’s a vaccine for the seasonal flu while scientists have yet to develop one for Covid. So if the latest fatality numbers hold, then Covid will turn out to be much less lethal than the Spanish flu. But calculating the fatality rate is difficult, and